Agenda and minutes

Venue: Committee Room, Council Offices, Urban Road, Kirkby-in-Ashfield

Contact: Lynn Cain  Email:

No. Item


Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary or Personal Interests and/or Non-Registrable Interests


No declarations of interest were made.


Minutes pdf icon PDF 200 KB



that the minutes of the meeting of the Panel held on 14 October 2021, be received and approved as a correct record.


(During consideration of this item, Councillor Lauren Mitchell entered the meeting at 7.05pm.)



Scrutiny Review: Selective Licensing Scheme pdf icon PDF 389 KB


The Scrutiny Research Officer presented the report and reminded Members that they had first embarked on the Tenancy Support review back in September 2021.  As the work evolved, Members took the opportunity to concurrently consider and respond to the Council’s review of the Selective Licensing Scheme that was coming to its conclusion after the five-year pilot period.


Having worked closely with the Service Manager for Strategic Housing & Lettings and the Environmental Health Team Leader to gather information and understand the implications and benefits of extending the Scheme, Members provisionally agreed two recommendations (for consideration by Cabinet) at the Scrutiny Panel A Informal Working Group meeting held on Thursday 20 January 2022 as follows:


1.    Cabinet is recommended to approve the renewal of the Selective Licensing Scheme.


2.    Cabinet is recommended to explore the feasibility of expanding the Selective Licensing Scheme to other areas in the District that may meet the criteria.


Feedback from the public consultation exercise and final proposals for extension of the Council’s Selective Licensing Scheme were due to be presented to Cabinet on 29 March 2022 and it was agreed that the Panel’s recommendations with regard to the Scheme, would be submitted alongside the report for consideration.


Members were therefore asked to endorse the two proposed recommendations and make any final additions/amendments to the Panel’s response, for encapsulation in the final Cabinet report.


A debate was undertaken, and Members considered the following:


·       some concerns were raised for empty properties that fell outside the Scheme boundaries and how inequalities might emerge within the District, in relation to property standards


·       the importance of the Scheme being self funding and not requiring the use of any funding from the Council’s Housing Revenue Account (HRA)


·       the potential benefits of widening the Scheme to other areas in the District to raise standards of private sector rental accommodation


·       acknowledgement that although valuable lessons had been learnt from the pilot scheme, the Scheme as a whole had more than delivered on its objectives


·       a request to see the finances associated with the pilot scheme to have confirmation that the pilot was self-funding in its delivery

·       concerns around the employment of two additional staff to support delivery of the Scheme and any potential duplication of support provided by the Council (in relation to tenant concerns) that was already being offered through the national housing ombudsman


·       acknowledgement of the importance of good private rental property provision being available alongside Council social housing to meet the ever increasing needs of residents who require warm, secure homes for themselves and their families


·       the benefits of the Council building good working relationships with private sector landlords to enable synergistic working practices to be undertaken to provide decent rental accommodation generally and to also meet the immediate needs of people presenting as homeless


·       recognition that the Selective Licensing Scheme had been a success and that Council officers had worked hard to deliver the pilot scheme.


On conclusion of the debate, the Scrutiny Research Officer summarised Members’ responses to the  ...  view the full minutes text for item SA.9


Scrutiny Review: Gambling Harms pdf icon PDF 301 KB


The Chairman introduced the new scrutiny review topic regarding Gambling Harms.  The topic was added to the scrutiny work programme at the December 2021 meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee and it was agreed that the topic had the potential to be interesting, informative and thought provoking.


The Centre for Governance and Scrutiny (CfGS) were also currently working on a project with the Gambling Commission to raise awareness and increase the involvement of elected members in overview and scrutiny roles for tackling gambling related harms.  Gambling, particularly through online platforms including gaming sites, was on the rise and people were now starting to gamble at a younger age.  It was acknowledged that local authorities were often on the receiving end of the resulting social issues arising from gambling difficulties (alongside partners including the NHS and Police) in the form of homelessness and anti-social behaviour (ASB) problems.


However, it needed to be acknowledged that not all gambling had negative consequences and the review would hopefully investigate how the Council could work proactively in partnership with other key organisations to assist, support and mitigate against families struggling with gambling issues such as debt management, homelessness, anti-social behaviour and even suicide.


Julian Alison, the Council’s Licensing Manager took the opportunity to give an overview of the Council’s current role in facilitating licensing applications and regulating gambling on premises.  The Council currently had 3 bingo halls, 11 bookmakers and various public houses/premises with slot machines and consideration of any licensing applications for this type of premises would need to satisfy the three gambling licencing objectives as follows:


·       preventing gambling from being a source of crime or disorder, being associated with crime or disorder or being used to support crime


·       ensuring that gambling is conducted in a fair and open way


·       protecting children and other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by gambling.


At this point Members were asked to note that the Council had no jurisdiction over any form of online licensing for gambling.


The Council’s Statement of Gambling Policy included a section in relation to a local area profile in which areas of ASB within the District were highlighted and would be referred to in any licensing applications for gambling purposes.  Gambling premises within Ashfield were currently subject to annual compliance checks and to date no issues/complaints had been documented from these inspections.  In any event staff within these premises were always trained to take care of and support vulnerable people utilising the in house gambling facilities.


To conclude, the Licensing Manager did acknowledge that such tight controls prescribed to be undertaken by local authorities did not seem to currently extend to online gambling and any advertisements through television and social media channels.


The Chairman thanked Julian for his informative presentation and Members then proceeded to discuss the following:


·       concerns surrounding loot boxes provided on gaming platforms as a potential gambling risk to children and young people and the urgent need for education within schools to combat this introduction  ...  view the full minutes text for item SA.10