Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, Urban Road, Kirkby-in-Ashfield

Contact: Lynn Cain  Email: lynn.cain@ashfield.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

P.16

Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary or Personal Interests and/or Non-Registrable Interests

Minutes:

Councillor Jason Zadrozny declared a Non-Registrable Interest in respect of

V/2020/0832, Platform Housing Ltd, Application for Approval of Reserved Matters following Outline Approval V/2018/0213 - Proposed Residential Development of 47 Dwellings Including the Demolition of Existing Buildings, The Quarry, 57 Stoneyford Road, Sutton in Ashfield. His interest arose from the fact that he had previously been vocal about the vandalism and historical relevant of the stone wall contained on the site but in doing so had not

expressed any opinions on the application at any point.

P.17

Minutes pdf icon PDF 357 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED

that the minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 6 October

2021, be received and approved as a correct record.

P.18

Town and Country Planning Act 1990: Town Planning Applications Requiring Decisions pdf icon PDF 7 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Prior to consideration of the applications and in accordance with Council

Procedure Rule 4 (Order of Business), the Chairman advised that he would

be considering the fourth application, V/2021/0506, Mrs Bird, Change of Use from Existing Dwelling house C3 Use Class to 7 Bedroom HMO Sui Generis Use Class, 248 Mansfield Road, Skegby, as the first item.  Committee Members concurred with this course of action.

 

1.  V/2021/0506, Mrs Bird, Change of Use from Existing Dwelling house C3 Use Class to 7 Bedroom HMO Sui Generis Use Class, 248 Mansfield Road, Skegby

 

In accordance with the Council’s Policy for dealing with late matters in relation

to planning applications, (Minute No. D4.17, 1993/94 refers), officers proceeded to give a verbal report as to additional comments received in relation to the application as follows:-

 

Carrie Bird, the Applicant and Councillor Will Bostock, who had jointly called-in the application but was not on the Planning Committee, took the opportunity to address the Committee in respect of this matter. As per the agreed process, Members were then offered the opportunity to clarify any points raised during the submissions as required.

 

Councillor Kevin Rostance also read out a statement on Councillor Melanie Darrington’s behalf as she had jointly called-in the application but could not attend the meeting in person.

 

It was moved and seconded that the application be deferred to enable officers to seek a management plan and travel plan from the Applicant with the application being re-submitted to Committee at the earliest opportunity.

 

The meeting was adjourned at 10.50am and reconvened at 11.00am.

 

2.  V/2020/0832, Platform Housing Ltd, Application for Approval of Reserved Matters following Outline Approval V/2018/0213 - Proposed Residential Development of 47 Dwellings Including the Demolition of Existing Buildings, The Quarry, 57 Stoneyford Road, Sutton in Ashfield

 

(In accordance with the Council’s Constitution and the Members’ Code of Conduct, Councillor Jason Zadrozny had previously declared a Non-Registrable interest in respect of this application. His interest was such that he stayed in the meeting and took part in the discussion and voting thereon.)

 

In accordance with the Council’s Policy for dealing with late matters in relation

to planning applications, (Minute No. D4.17, 1993/94 refers), officers proceeded to give a verbal report as to additional comments received in relation to the application as follows:-

 

A local resident was concerned over the loss of another wall within the District and suggested that the wall along the frontage of the site should be rebuilt seamlessly using original bricks and mortar. 

 

Comments had also been received from the Clinical Commission Group regarding Health Care contributions and Severn Trent had advised that they might need to undertake capital improvements works in the catchment area but this was not a requirement of the applicant.

 

Officer Response

 

The implications for the wall had been addressed within the officer report and the Health Care contributions were covered in the Section 106 legal agreement associated with the outline consent.  No changes were therefore required.

 

Leeven Fleet, on behalf of the Applicant, took the  ...  view the full minutes text for item P.18

P.19

Planning Appeal Decisions pdf icon PDF 134 KB

Minutes:

Members were asked to note the recent Planning Appeal decisions as outlined in the report.

 

RESOLVED

that the report be received and noted.