Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, Urban Road, Kirkby-in-Ashfield

Contact: Lynn Cain  Email: lynn.cain@ashfield.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

P.13

Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary or Personal Interests and/or Non-Registrable Interests

Minutes:

Councillor Jason Zadrozny declared a Non-Registrable Interest in respect of V/2021/0388, Mr. S. Paal-Coates, Change of Use from Residential to Residential and Childminding, 54 Oxford Street, Kirkby in Ashfield.  His interest arose from the fact that he had previously been acquainted with the applicant through attendance at college.

P.14

Minutes pdf icon PDF 217 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED

that the minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 25 August

2021, be received and approved as a correct record.

P.15

Town and Country Planning Act 1990: Town Planning Applications Requiring Decisions pdf icon PDF 7 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

1.  Application V/2020/0784, C Rowe, Outline Application for a Residential Development, Land West Off Fisher Close, Sutton in Ashfield

 

In accordance with the Council’s Policy for dealing with late matters in relation

to planning applications, (Minute No. D4.17, 1993/94 refers), officers

proceeded to give a verbal report as to additional comments received in

relation to the application as follows:-

 

An additional three letters of objection had been received from local residents. The objections raised no new planning issues that had not been covered in the report. It suggested that not all residents had been consulted on the application and the timing of the meeting prevented members of the local community attending and speaking.

 

Officer Response

 

As stated at the last Committee the consultation was carried out in accordance with the relevant legislation. Emails and letters had been sent out to all objectors informing them of the Committee and a local resident had registered to address Members at the meeting.

 

Sarah Brooke, as an objector and David Cummins, for the Applicant, took the opportunity to address the Committee in respect of this matter.  As per the agreed process, Members were then offered the opportunity to clarify any points raised during the submission as required.

 

(At this point in the proceedings, Councillor Helen-Ann Smith declared a Non-Registrable Interest in respect of this application.  Her interest arose from the fact that she was a non-voting member of the Stanton Hill and Teversal Neighbourhood Forum.)

 

It was moved and seconded that conditional consent be granted as per

officer’s recommendation.

 

The meeting was adjourned at 10.53am and reconvened at 11.02am. 

 

Due to the Committee Chairman, Councillor Sarah Madigan, being taken unwell following determination of the first application, the Vice-Chairman Councillor Andy Meakin duly took control of proceedings.

 

2.  Application V/2021/0388, Mr S Paal-Coates, Change of Use from Residential to Residential and Childminding, 54 Oxford Street, Kirkby in Ashfield

 

The Applicant, Laura Paal-Coates took the opportunity to address the Committee in respect of this matter.  As per the agreed process, Members were then offered the opportunity to clarify any points raised during the submission as required.

 

It was moved by Councillor Jason Zadrozny and seconded by Councillor Lauren Mitchell that:

 

a)    officer’s recommendation contained within the report be rejected and planning consent be granted subject to the following conditions:

 

1.     The use hereby permitted shall be carried out only by Mrs Laura Paal-Coates.

2.     The use of the hereby permitted development for childminding shall only take place during the following hours:  07:30am - 05:30pm.

3.     No more than 10 children and 2 staff (which includes the applicant) shall be present on site at any one time in association with the childminding business.

 

b)    delegated authority be granted to the Assistant Director, Planning and Regulatory Services, in consultation the Planning Committee Chairman, to consider and include any additional conditions as deemed appropriate.

 

Reasons for rejecting officers’ recommendation:

It was considered by Members that the impact on amenities would not be significant and no objections had been  ...  view the full minutes text for item P.15